Login / Register Order My Items
Contact Us
800.227.0627
Contact Us Quote Order Login / Register

Peptide–Biodegradable Polymer Conjugation

Custom peptide–polymer conjugation services using biodegradable polymer scaffolds and cleavable linkers for research and preclinical programs.

Request a Quote Speak to a Chemist
Talk to a chemist Request a quote
Overview Polymer Comparison Deliverables & QC Related Services FAQ Selection Guide Contact

Overview

We provide custom peptide–biodegradable polymer conjugation services to support discovery, formulation development, and preclinical programs. Typical goals include controlled peptide release, time-dependent exposure, and minimizing long-term polymer persistence by leveraging degradable polymer backbones and/or cleavable linkers. All constructs are supplied for research and non-human use unless otherwise agreed in writing. [1], [2]

Biodegradation behavior can be tuned through polymer composition, molecular weight, architecture, and end-group chemistry (polymer-dependent). In many projects, peptide release is driven primarily by linker design (e.g., hydrolysable, redox-cleavable, or enzyme-cleavable motifs), while the polymer provides the desired residence time and formulation behavior.

PLGA / PLA / PGA PCL Polyanhydrides Poly(ortho esters) Poly(amino acid) polymers Backbone degradation Cleavable linkers

See also PEGylated Peptide Synthesis when polymer biodegradation is not required.

Biodegradable Polymer Comparison

Representative biodegradable polymers used for peptide conjugation are summarized below. Final selection depends on peptide properties (sequence, hydrophobicity, stability), desired degradation timescale, and intended study duration. [2], [3]

Polymer Degradation mechanism Typical timescale Common use cases Design considerations
PLGA Ester hydrolysis (bulk erosion) Weeks to months Sustained peptide release, depot-style systems Acidic degradation products; hydrophobicity may affect peptide stability
PLA / PGA Ester hydrolysis PLA: slower
PGA: faster		 Component polymers for PLGA-based designs Crystallinity and composition influence degradation and release behavior
PCL Ester hydrolysis Months to years Long-term peptide exposure studies Highly hydrophobic; spacer or linker design often required
Polyanhydrides Surface erosion Days to weeks Controlled, near-linear release profiles More specialized chemistry; limited commercial availability
Poly(ortho esters) Surface erosion Tunable (days to weeks) Release systems with minimal acidic microenvironment Formulation-sensitive; less commonly used
Poly(amino acid) polymers Enzymatic degradation Variable (enzyme-dependent) Biocompatible, peptide-like scaffolds Synthesis complexity; lower mechanical stability
Poly(β-amino esters) Ester hydrolysis + pH sensitivity Hours to days pH-responsive intracellular delivery studies Faster degradation; limited long-term stability

Note: In some designs, peptide release is primarily controlled by a cleavable linker rather than polymer backbone degradation. Polymer and linker strategies are selected together to match the intended application and analytical requirements.

Biodegradation Mechanisms

Biodegradable polymers can degrade by bulk erosion (water penetrates the matrix and degradation occurs throughout) or surface erosion (material erodes primarily from the exterior). Bulk- vs surface-erosion behavior can influence peptide release profiles and the local microenvironment [2], [3].

Schematic illustrating biodegradation mechanisms of PLGA bulk erosion versus polyanhydride surface erosion.
Figure: Interpretation: PLGA and related polyesters often exhibit bulk erosion, while polyanhydrides are commonly cited as surface-eroding materials. Actual behavior can vary with composition, geometry, and environment.

Deliverables & Fit-for-Purpose QC

Supported attachment strategies
  • N-terminus (single-site attachment when appropriate)
  • Single Cys (native or engineered) for thiol-selective workflows
  • Selected side chains (e.g., Lys; project-dependent)
  • Orthogonal handles (azide/alkyne) for click-enabled designs

Site-defined approaches are prioritized to reduce heterogeneity when feasible.

Representative analytical package
  • SEC/GPC (size distribution; polymer-dependent)
  • LC-MS or MALDI-TOF (identity confirmation where feasible)
  • Degree of substitution (DOS) estimation
  • Project-defined reporting (purity/identity/size metrics)

Analytics are tailored to polymer type and intended use (discovery, formulation, preclinical).

Polymer Conjugation Selection Guide

Use the table below to identify the most suitable conjugation strategy based on your primary experimental objective.

Design goal PEGylated peptides Biodegradable polymer–peptide Lipid–peptide conjugates
PK extension / circulation time ✅ Best choice ⚠️ Possible ❌ Not typical
Sustained or delayed release ❌ No ✅ Best choice ⚠️ Possible
Polymer biodegradation ❌ Non-degradable ✅ Yes ⚠️ Variable
Membrane interaction / self-assembly ❌ No ⚠️ Limited ✅ Best choice

See PEGylated Peptide Synthesis, Biodegradable Polymer Conjugation, and Peptide–Lipid Conjugates for platform-specific details.

FAQ

What is a biodegradable polymer in peptide conjugation?

Biodegradable polymers degrade into lower-molecular-weight products under biologically relevant conditions (e.g., hydrolysis or enzymatic degradation). In peptide conjugation, biodegradability can arise from the polymer backbone, a cleavable linker, or both, to support controlled peptide release.

Which polymers are most common for biodegradable peptide–polymer conjugates?

Common polymers include PLGA, PCL, polyanhydrides, poly(ortho esters), and poly(amino acid) polymers. Selection depends on degradation timescale, peptide stability, and formulation considerations.

Do you support cleavable linker strategies?

Yes. Many projects use cleavable linkers (hydrolysable, redox-cleavable, or enzyme-cleavable) to control peptide release, while the polymer provides residence time and formulation behavior.

What characterization is available?

Fit-for-purpose characterization may include SEC/GPC for size distribution, LC-MS or MALDI-TOF for identity where feasible, and degree-of-substitution estimation. The package is tailored to polymer class and target attributes.

More FAQ'sAll FAQ's

Request a Quote

What to provide
  • Peptide sequence and desired attachment site (N-terminus, single-Cys, etc.)
  • Target polymer (PLGA, PCL, polyanhydride, poly(ortho ester), poly(amino acid), etc.)
  • Polymer MW/composition and desired degradation window (if known)
  • Linker preference (cleavable vs stable) and intended application
  • Target quantity and purity/QC expectations

Share your design details and timeline. Our scientists will recommend a feasible conjugation strategy and an analytical plan aligned to your project goals.

Fastest path
Request a Quote Contact Us

Recommended Reading

  1. Reviews of PEGylation and PEGylated bioconjugates (design considerations, PK effects). PubMed search
  2. Reviews of biodegradable polyesters (PLGA/PLA/PCL) for controlled release and delivery applications. PubMed search
  3. Reviews of surface-eroding polymers (polyanhydrides, poly(ortho esters)) and erosion-controlled release. PubMed search
  4. Reviews of lipid–peptide conjugates and peptide lipidation strategies (membrane interaction, self-assembly, formulation). PubMed search
  5. Reviews of cleavable linker strategies for controlled release (hydrolysable, redox, enzyme-cleavable). PubMed search

These links are starting points; we can align citations to your preferred journal style on request.

Why Choose Bio-Synthesis

Trusted by biotech leaders worldwide for over 40+ years of delivering high quality, fast and scalable synthetic biology solutions.

Greetings Researchers,

Please be advised that any information, guidelines, writeups, and oral/video/graphic content on our website are intended solely as general guidelines.
It is the researcher's sole responsibility to conduct thorough research on the designs of the products intended for their experiments before submitting
their designs to Biosynthesis for review of production feasibility.
Thank you for your understanding.

Quick Links